http://ift.tt/2bKtuf1
Suppression motion. Court decided that 4th amendment is irrelevant basically.
Certainly if no RAS is there, no ID can be required. Anything after the start of the unlawful detention is void per our natural rights and 4th amendment rights.
The motion should have been heard on its merits. Not that in this case the defendant would have won but for other cases where RAS/PC is lacking...now one cannot motion to suppress evidence obtained after the unlawful detention.
I don't subscribe to the idea that a citizen must accept a kidnapping by the .govs and then argue about it later. Our natural rights prevail. I would never find anyone guilty of resisting or other charge in a case where the .gov had no RAS or PC or warrant etc.
Suppression motion. Court decided that 4th amendment is irrelevant basically.
Certainly if no RAS is there, no ID can be required. Anything after the start of the unlawful detention is void per our natural rights and 4th amendment rights.
The motion should have been heard on its merits. Not that in this case the defendant would have won but for other cases where RAS/PC is lacking...now one cannot motion to suppress evidence obtained after the unlawful detention.
I don't subscribe to the idea that a citizen must accept a kidnapping by the .govs and then argue about it later. Our natural rights prevail. I would never find anyone guilty of resisting or other charge in a case where the .gov had no RAS or PC or warrant etc.
More judges who do not understand out rights and the 4th amendment
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire