Court rejects concealed carry argument. Ch. 167 does not moot § 941.23

mercredi 30 novembre 2016

The argument cites a law that says weapons may not be transported unless unloaded, (or if a bow, unstrung) and encased during transport, "unless the weapon is a handgun." The wording was added in 2011 to allow for people with newly legal concealed carry permits to have their guns with them in their cars.

And that's the point District 1 Judge Patricia Curley made in the case of Brian Grandberry — the exception is clearly meant for people with concealed carry permits, even if the wording of the two related statutes doesn't mesh as well as it should.
[ ... ]
"To adopt Grandberry’s position would be to practically abrogate the CCW statute and make almost all loaded guns found in vehicles legal. This would be contrary to the legislative purpose behind the CCW permit."
[ ... ]
[Guy A. Smith] A Merrill truck driver is advancing a similar defense to a concealed carry charge in Kenosha. He argues that as a long-haul trucker, his cab is often both his home and his place of business, locations where otherwise legal possessors of guns do not need a concealed carry permit to keep their weapons.

http://ift.tt/2gwVeaH


Court rejects concealed carry argument. Ch. 167 does not moot § 941.23

0 commentaires:

Enregistrer un commentaire